Saturday, January 30, 2010

The Elephant in the Room

These days I am sure we are all paying attention to the nation’s recovery report card, the stock market’s daily mood swings, the price of gas, the staggering unemployment numbers, and oh yes, the foreclosure market that has been like a wild fire in the Southern California hills; it just keeps growing and spreading. The GDP appears strong at a fourth quarter annual growth rate of 5.7%, but home sales in December were down 7.6%. Does that make sense? Oh sure it does, because December is always a slow month for sales and there was that hiccup in the home buyer tax credit program. I’m not forgetting about unemployment, but why talk about it even though it is the biggest elephant in the room. Well, I guess we have to talk about it because our local flagship newspaper needs a sensational story to fill column inches.

Much to the displeasure of the real estate community, the Gazette once again decided to paint a most negative depressing picture about the real estate market, and the overall state of our union all in the name of truth penned by its resident editorial curmudgeon. The front page headline reads, “Foreclosures and Joblessness Up”. Sure we have about 24 bank owned properties in Dukes County that we are working to absorb, and there will surely be more on the way during this year. However, the writer insists on going on and on about the column inches all the foreclosures are taking up in print, and now we can put a number on unemployment predicting 50% over the next couple months, compared to about half that in normal times. With no new home starts, everyone counting pennies, only buying essentials and eating at home instead of going out to dinner, is this really breaking news?

The good news in this editorial according to Chris Wells, president of MV Savings Bank is petitions to foreclose are not nearly what they are in the rest of Southern New England and the median sale prices in some towns actually increased from 2008 to 2009. West Tisbury shows a 2% increase and Edgartown a 14% increase in median sales prices. According to Mr. Wells, in the other three Island towns, Oak Bluffs was down 27%, Tisbury was down 19% and Chilmark saw the greatest reduction at 43% median sales price.

Martha’s Vineyard continues to bravely soldier on, its citizens doing all they can to make ends meet and keep a stiff upper lip. We have always been a hot and cold running Island with jobs for everyone during the tourist season and one of the highest, if not the highest unemployment rates in the Commonwealth for what amounts to 8 months during the off season. The Island greeting has become variations of “we’re hanging in there” and assurances that “we are all in this together”. Whew, I feel better already. What we all look for every day is some good news, news that will inspire us to keep on because we know summer is coming and with the sun we look forward to greeting all those visitors who love what Martha’s Vineyard has to offer, a simpler way of life.  Oh by the way, bring your checkbook and support the Island economy.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Monday, January 25, 2010

The Nationwide Mortgage Licensing System and Registry launches NMLS Consumer Access Website

The Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation announced that the Nationwide Mortgage Licensing System and Registry (NMLS), a mortgage licensing system operated by state financial regulators including the Massachusetts Division of Banks, launched the “NMLS Consumer Access”. There hope is that it will help protect mortgage shoppers from unscrupulous loan originators.

NMLS Consumer Access is a fully searchable single-source consumer access website that allows the public to verify state-licensed mortgage lenders, brokers and individuals currently licensed through NMLS. Future updates to NMLS Consumer Access will provide a record of applicable disciplinary actions taken against a licensee by any jurisdiction in the country.

The NMLS Consumer Access website was finally launched in January 2010 and the NMLS Resource Center, claims the website will bring greater transparency to the mortgage industry and compliance with provisions of the SAFE Act.

The database of companies and individuals will be updated nightly and will tell consumers whether the person they're working with has had their license suspended or revoked in another state, and will list any aliases the individual has used since the age of 18. It will also seek to discover whether that person is engaged in other sidelines and what that person’s license status is in other jurisdictions.

You can download a .PDF pamphlet of Information about NMLS Consumer Access prepared by the NMLS Resource Center.

Labels: , , , , ,

Sunday, January 24, 2010

Is Your Real Estate Agent a Spy?

Is your agent a spy? What kind of question is that; it's an important question spawned by the constant controversy and confusion about AGENCY. Who does an agent represent and how do they represent them? The answer to that question can mean thousands of dollars in or out of a buyer's pocket.

I try my best to illustrate the nuances and various types of Agency to consumers on my website, but no matter how I explain the differences, I find most people just don’t get it. However, I really don’t blame them because it is the real estate industry that prefers to keep the smoke screen smoldering to allow for maximum personal gain.

The organization I belong to, The National Association of Exclusive Buyer Agents (NAEBA), continues to lobby for a clearer definition or distinction and separation between those agents that proclaim loudly that they can represent buyers as exclusive buyer agents, yet under their breath slide in the disclaimer or, more appropriately, the caveat, “with the right to transition to dual agency”. That is where the true distinction lies and dual agency is the problem. Attorneys and those in the know think dual agency is a double standard and fertile ground for suspicion and potential favoritism ultimately resulting in litigation. Some states already prohibit the practice of dual agency.

I was reading an article in a trade news publication where a consumer was buying a home and wanted to know how the process would work if the home she was interested in was being offered by a real estate agent who would be working as what the buyer ironically called a “double” agent? In other words, working for both the buyer and the seller. What was really interesting was the choice of words since what she was talking about was a “dual” agent. Subconsciously, she viewed the agent as a double agent. The definition of double agent is “A person pretending to work as a spy for one government (company, etc.) while actually working as a spy for another government (company, etc.).

To pull this back into the real estate vernacular let’s look at this as what is called single-agent dual agency, that being a relationship where one agent represents (?) both the buyer and the seller in the same transaction. That agent can no longer offer the same fiduciary responsibilities to either party as if they were representing one exclusively. The dual agent cannot provide Undivided Loyalty. This is an important point because as a client fiduciary an agent representing a buyer or a seller exclusively is sworn to treat the client’s best interests above their own. Other obligations that cannot be met in a dual agency arrangement are Obedience, Reasonable Care and Diligence and Full Disclosure. The dual agent is required not to disclose any confidential information about both parties. But let me ask you this; in 99% of cases, who do you think the (seller) agent has had the longer term relationship with? You, the buyer or the seller they have the listing agreement with? As a buyer, did you tell your agent the maximum amount you are willing to pay for the property or any other tidbits you would not want to the seller to know about you? Do you think the seller told their agent what their bottom line is or why they are selling? If the agent divulges any of that privileged confidential information without authorization, it is an actionable offense. There is one important point to note and that is that you as a buyer have the right to say no to dual agency when signing an exclusive buyer agency agreement, but that means your buyer agent cannot show you properties listed by their broker agency. The same holds true for a seller.

Most people entering into the Martha’s Vineyard real estate market do not live here and are usually from another part of the country. They know nothing about this market and if they are wise they realize they will need help, not just with looking for the right property or formulating a negotiation strategy, but most importantly with all the due diligence that is essential between the Offer to Purchase and the day of Closing. They need to be exclusively represented 100% of the time.

NAEBA continues to advocate for a clearer explanation of the differences so the public can be better protected. I was speaking to a web advertising sales representative yesterday and asked him why they cannot change the category headings in the real estate agency listing section to read SELLER AGENCIES and BUYER AGENCIES, instead of SALES AGENCIES and BUYER AGENCIES. Wouldn’t that make a little more sense? I doubt we will ever see two distinct categories --- BUYER AGENCIES and EXCLUSIVELY BUYER AGENCIES, because the National Association of REALTORS® continues to allow for the oxymoron labeled as Exclusive Buyer Representation with the right to transition to Dual Agency, but Brokers who believe in my business model will continue to educate the public about the advantages of being represented “Exclusively”.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Saturday, January 02, 2010

Traditional Real Estate Agencies Rarely Sell Their Own Listings!

Did you know most listings are not sold by the agency representing the seller? The national average a number of years ago was around 13%. However, I was speaking to the principal broker of a large real estate agency not too long ago and she told me her company probably sells only about 5%-10% of their listings in-house. Isn’t that interesting?

I think this is actually a good thing for consumers and real estate professionals alike; it avoids a very precarious situation known as Dual Agency which means neither the buyer nor the seller are represented. The listing agency always represents the seller’s best interest and cannot assist a buyer unless unilateral consent to Dual Agency is given. Therefore, for those who think they can get a better deal by going directly to the listing agency, that is generally a false assumption. Undisclosed Dual Agency would be breaking the law. That is why buyers should find a buyer agent who knows what they are doing, has good relationships with seller agents and is a good negotiator.

Here on Martha's Vineyard, most seller agents realize their listings are overpriced, but they have to appease their seller clients who think they know better. The good-guy, bad-guy dynamic created by the separation between seller agent and exclusive buyer agent usually produces a much more advantageous outcome for all concerned. To be safe and have full access to all properties for sale, I suggest you always hire an EXCLUSIVE Buyer Agent. That way there can be no necessity for creating a Dual Agency relationship and the possible conflict of interest. To be blunt, you want SplitRock Real Estate on your side, and if you need representation in another part of Massachusetts or another part of the country, I will help you get the best exclusive buyer representation.

Labels: , , , , ,

Saturday, December 26, 2009

The Bottom Of The Market Feels Like A Bumpy Road

It’s the New Year, and just in time the banks are raising interest rates, but just a little – so far. However, the banks are also relaxing their down-payment requirements because they are seeing increased confidence in the housing market. The truth, according to one banker friend I spoke with is because they are not making any money. They need to make loans to make money. In some markets borrowers can now borrow 95% of a property’s value. Of course one would hope this means property values are not going down any further and loan applicants are going to be scrupulously vetted?



Despite favorable sales figures as we finished out this year, Tim Warren Jr., CEO of the Warren Group sees home prices bouncing up and down along the bottom during the next 3-6 months, and possibly throughout most of 2010 even though sales figures will appear to continue trending positively. This is the way it was in the early 90’s as we pulled out of the last recession. Some economists call this an “L” recession. For sure the recovery is going to be slow, but I do think it is safe to say we are at the bottom albeit a bumpy bottom. I believe in making a decision about when is the best time for you to buy an investment property one indicator you should pay attention to is interest rates. When interest rates go up this can herald the onset of an inflationary period.


Warren feels it was the rush to take advantage of the initial first-time home buyer tax credit by signing contracts before November 2009 expiration that contributed the biggest boost to the market. Wednesday’s WSJ reported that first-time buyers made up 51% of purchases in November, according to NAR. The initial first-time home buyer tax credit has been extended and broadened to include more potential buyers which may once again give a boost to the housing market. Contracts have to be signed by April 30, 2010 with closing dates on or before June 30, 2010. According to Carl Reichardt, an analyst with Wells Fargo, “The spring selling season would be critical to determining whether a possible double-dip is at hand, or whether housing’s recovery will regain steam.”

Tim Warren believes another reason for the upturn is the brighter unemployment figures in Massachusetts which in turn enhance consumer confidence. Okay, but one of my sources tells me the actual national unemployment figure is above 17%, if you factor in the non-registered ‘shadow’ unemployed.

News Flash: Massachusetts unemployment rate drops slightly from 8.9% to 8.8%
Read about it here > http://www.businessconnector.biz/news/show/523

In January, it is predicted that 1,000,000 unemployed workers will lose their benefits. Another prediction is going to be a surge in commercial foreclosures as more companies lay off workers and close doors in leased office spaces. But who knows? I still believe in miracles.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, December 24, 2009

THERE IS A LOT OF UNCERTAINTY AS WE HEAD INTO 2010


Will we see more Foreclosures? Will we see more Short Sales? Will we see more Unemployment? Sadly, the answer to all these questions is yes. Most likely all of these events will once again push home prices down further. Here’s another question: will interest rates go up? Most analysts say yes; they will go up in 2010.

It’s clear that people are in the market now making purchases. They are taking advantage of the low – very low interest rates and the newly rewritten and extended first time home buyer tax credit. Many are using this new opportunity to trade up to the home of their dreams. But does this mean the market is recovering or do we have further to travel before we bottom out? I just don’t know.

Here's what HomeGain.com, a web marketing company that tracks the real estate market, has discovered in a recent survey.

62% of home BUYERS think homes on the market are overpriced.

76% of home OWNERS think their homes are worth more than their real estate agent recommends.

41% of home OWNERS think their homes’ listing price should be 10%-20% higher than their real estate agent recommends.

24% of real estate agents think home prices will go up in the next 6 months.

48% of real estate agents think home prices will remain flat in the next 6 months.

Note: NAR says 2mm people benefited from the first go-around of the tax credit. During this extension period of the Home Buyer Tax Credit, home owners who have been in their homes for 5 years can realize a tax credit deduction of up to $6,500 expansion, but they have to act soon.

Click here to read more > http://www.marealtor.com/content/Homebuyer_Tax_Credit.htm

What I do know is, as long as you have job stability, the monthly payments of your loan are affordable and not a stretch or based upon any projected rental income, and you are buying the home of your dreams that will make you happy for the long term, this is the time to buy. As I have said before, up or down, in ten years $10,000 to $20,000 will not matter, but don’t buy something just because the prices are attractive now – at least not on Martha’s Vineyard.

There are a number of properties on the market right now that appear to be very attractive buys. However, many of them are using an “As Is” caveat. That is because the seller usually does not have the funds to make any repairs that could possibly be discovered during a Structural Home Inspection. He is telling you the Buyer up front that no matter what the problem is; it is your problem. Your home inspector or your real estate agent may try to minimize the costs of the required repairs, but let me assure you nothing is inexpensive here on Martha’s Vineyard. Don’t romance yourself into false assumptions; have your buyer agent get you the facts. I do that for all my clients because I hate surprises.

So as this year skids to a close, let’s keep our eye on the prize, have a clear vision of what is important and move forward with intelligent thinking.

Labels: , , , , ,

If You Don't Buy a House Now, You're Stupid or Broke

Interest rates are at historic lows but cyclical trends suggest they will soon rise. Home buyers may never see such a chance again, writes Marc Roth for Business Week.

Labels: , , , , , ,

NAR 2009 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers


The National Association of Realtors® just released their 2009 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers. The report summarizes the responses of 9,138 buyers and sellers who bought or sold a home between July 2008 and June 2009.

47% of all buyers were first time buyers.

62% of first time buyers reported that the primary reason for buying a home was the desire to be a homeowner, 35% of all buyers reported that as the number 1 reason.

The median age of all buyers was 39, same as last year.

83% of all first time buyers are under the age 44.

62% of all buyers are under age 44.

68% of the buyers surveyed in the Northeast make less than $100,000 per year.

63% of all buyers had no children residing at home under the age of 18.

Buyers in the Northeast moved an average of 10 miles from where they currently lived.

90% of all buyers used the internet to search.

84% of buyers reported the photos to be the most useful information.

The number one action taken after viewing a home online was to drive by or visit the home.

66% of buyers reported that they used a print ad to search, but only 84% to 90% (depending on the print medium) reported that those sources were "not useful".

36% of buyers found the home they purchased through an agent, 36% found the home they purchased online, less than 3%found the home they purchased in a print ad.

77% of buyers purchased their home with an agent.

85% of sellers sold their home with an agent.

39% of the mortgages were FHA loans.

87% of buyers viewed real estate as a good investment.

Labels: , ,

Let's Play What's My Market


I was reading an article the other day that posed an interesting question about the current market. What kind of market are we in, a Buyer’s Market or a Seller’s Market?

As you know, the definition of a Buyer’s Market is one where there are more properties on the market than there are buyers willing to buy them. When a buyer makes an offer on a property, and the seller does not accept the offer, the buyer is likely to end negotiations and move on to another property because the market is perceived to be the land of plenty.

Is that true now? Are you looking for a particular property or type of property? Are you finding an abundance of properties that fit your profile? If the answer is no, then this is not a Buyer’s Market for you.

Conversely, a Seller’s Market is one where there is a large audience of eager buyers and limited inventory, resulting in multiple offers and a frenzy that inevitably drives up the final sale price. Believe it or not, this is happening in many areas of the country like California. Is it happening on Martha’s Vineyard and what is your view of the Martha’s Vineyard real estate market?

My opinion is that we are in a market we have never seen before. This is a bipolar or, dare I even say, a psychotic market. This is a market where the banks, lenders and appraisers control and determine the value and the fate of the market. This is also a market that depending upon the price line, location or circumstance can be a seller’s market, a buyer’s market, a lien-holder’s market, a lender’s market (there is a difference) or an appraiser’s market. Another facet of this market is what we call shadow inventories. There is an inventory of properties that are not on the market but available for sale if and/or when the market appears stable enough for those silent sellers to get their price. The banks are also holding inventory they have reclaimed through foreclosure, not so much on the Vineyard at this time, but to a great extent in other areas of the country. They are holding them until they feel they have a better chance to recoup their loss. Many of those properties were originally part of the ‘short sale’ inventory.

It would seem with prices and interest rates at historically low numbers first-time home buyers and trade-up home buyers would be running into the market and into the grateful open arms of eager sellers anxious to make a deal. Buyers should realize what a once in a lifetime opportunity they have to purchase the home of their dreams at today’s dollars and historically low interest rates. However, there is a pervasive sense of entitlement on both sides in today’s market that is preventing buyers and sellers from coming together.

Okay, so what is the problem? Ironically, as I am writing, I got my answer in a response to a conversation I am having with a seller agent regarding a buyer client who is interested in a couple of her listings. She says, “… both are pretty motivated...but these are not distress sales. We'll obviously consider any offer.” Who would put their property on the market today if they are not ‘motivated’ to sell? Ignoring the market data, sellers believe they are entitled to higher prices for their homes, and buyers believe they are entitled to even further discounts on homes that have already been heavily discounted. So once again, just like when we were children at our first dance; buyers will sit on one side, sellers will sit on the other side, both acquisitively looking at each other and missing the ‘last dance’.

Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, December 02, 2009

HouseLogic.com - A Great New Educational Web Site

I am a REALTOR® which means I belong to the world’s largest professional association with 1.1 million members. The National Association of REALTORS® or NAR has become one of the most powerful lobbying groups in the nation since its inception in 1908.

Most consumers do not understand what NAR does and probably think it is self-serving and has no relevance for them. NAR cares about the homeowner as well as those dreaming of becoming homeowners. That is why it enforces a strict Code of Ethics for its members. However, that is not all.

In an effort to bring better understanding for the real estate profession NAR has launched a new educational website, currently in beta format, that is aimed at engaging as many of the 75 million homeowner households as possible even if they are not currently in the market. HouseLogic.com is not merely another marketing channel for REALTORS®; it is focused on becoming an informational mecca for consumers providing useful tips, hints and articles, aimed at motivating homeowners to take more interest in their homes, more interest in maintaining and improving the value of their homes, and ultimately more interest in taking political action that supports home valuations, home sales and homeownership. If successful, with the voice and concern of the nation’s homeowners behind it, NAR would become an invincible force at practically all levels of government advocating for homeowners and the REALTORS® serving them.

Take a cruise through www.HouseLogic.com and see what you think. Knowledge is Power and SplitRock Real Estate creates Power Buyers.

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, November 26, 2009

Where To Now Martha's Vineyard?

Are you upside down? Did you know one in four home owners in America with a mortgage are under water? By that I mean their home is worth less than what they owe. The beginning of 2010 will see more Option ARM’s coming to term. In many cases where home prices have fallen drastically borrowers are so deeply under water that they can't refinance their mortgage in order to take advantage of take advantage of the current lower rates. "We're declining hundreds of loans each month," said Steve Walsh, a mortgage broker in Scottsdale, Ariz. "The only way we will make headway is if we allow for a streamlined refinance where the appraisal is irrelevant."

5.3 million homeowners have mortgages that are at least 120% of their homes’ value. According to Mark Fleming, chief economist of First American Core Logic, homeowners whose loan to value ratio is greater than 120% are more likely to default and 520,000 of these borrowers have received default notices. Even if they want to sell (Short Sale), they can’t afford to --- they’re stuck. Sanjiv Das, head of Citigroup's mortgage unit said "Beyond 120%, the most effective modification is a complete loan restructuring, including a principal reduction. Mr. Das goes on to say “Borrowers who are less than 20% under water are likely to maintain their mortgage if their loan is modified and the payments reduced”.

As financial institutions continue to struggle with how they are going to solve the mess they have created, about 588,000 borrowers defaulted on mortgages last year even though they had employment and could afford to pay. That is more than double the number in 2007, according to a study by Experian and consulting firm Oliver Wyman. "The American consumer has had a long-held taboo against walking away from the home, and this crisis seems to be eroding that," the study said. Previously the advice to borrowers has been, only by defaulting on their loans will lenders pay attention and consider adjusting rates and principals in line with today’s market. However, lenders have been reluctant to reduce mortgage principal over worries about "moral contagion, with people not paying their mortgage or re-defaulting because they believed the bank would reduce their principal," Mr. Das said.

I expect that we will see more loan defaults on Martha’s Vineyard and more foreclosure auctions at the beginning of 2010 despite the fact that we have leveled out in our market. In the early 90’s we called this moment in the market a “trough”. I also think the Martha’s Vineyard recovery will slow down because; with the optimistic forecast more less-motivated homeowners have placed their properties back on the market at overly optimistic prices. I believe the result will be a stall in the market because everyone is confused. However, I still maintain that this is a great time to buy. Look at what you have going for you. Interest rates hit an all time record low this week averaging 4.78% on a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage --- this has never happened before in all the time Freddie Mac has been keeping records. For comparison sake, the interest rate last year was 5.97%. "Interest rates for 30-year fixed-rate loans are currently 0.8 percentage points below this year's peak set in mid-June, which shaves roughly $100 off the monthly payments on a $200,000 mortgage," said Frank Nothaft, Freddie Mac chief economist. Interest rates will only go in one direction from here, and don’t forget the extended and broadened home buyer tax credit; it no longer applies only to first time home buyers.

I want to urge you, if you see something you like take a run at it. You will never know what you can negotiate until you engage, but be patient, realistic and resolute in your objective. $20,000 one way or the other today is not going to make a difference ten years from now.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Saturday, November 07, 2009

Great News for Martha's Vineyard Home Buyers!

First-Time Home Buyer Tax Credit

President Obama signed the Homebuyer Tax Credit into law after overwhelming votes for it in Congress. The credit takes effect as of November 6, 2009. To be eligible, a purchase contract must be signed by April 30, 2010, and close on or before June 30, 2010. This is a very narrow window of opportunity so pay attention and don't miss out.

Not only is the existing $8,000 tax credit for first-time homebuyers extended but a new "Homebuyer Tax Credit" of up to $6,500 for some existing homeowners has been added. The reduced credit would be available to all homebuyers who have been in their current residence for a consecutive five-year period in the past eight years.

The qualifying income limits are being raised to $125,000 for single taxpayers and $250,000 for joint taxpayers, from the current $75,000 and $150,000.

Martha’s Vineyard Land Bank “M” Exemption

In an effort to stimulate home sales to first-time home buyers, the Martha’s Vineyard Land Bank has increased the credit amount of the “M” Exemption. The “M” Exemption is a credit given only to eligible first-time home buyers toward the Land Bank Fee of 2% of the purchase price of real estate on Martha’s Vineyard.

Prior to September 1, 2004, the “M” exemption was $100,000 and in order to qualify all parties on the deed may not have ever owned real property at any time, not just on Martha’s Vineyard but anywhere. Subsequently, it was increased to $300,000 and the exemption was available to first-time purchasers of real estate who will domicile on the property within two years and hold the property for at least five years from the date of transfer. In the case of spouses, either spouse can have owned or possessed an interest in real property prior to the time of purchase, but not both spouses. As of October 27, 2009, per a recent amendment to the land bank law, first time purchasers may now claim a $400,000 "M" exemption. All of the other requirements of the "M" exemption are unchanged.

Mortgage Interest Rates Remain Below 5%

Although inflation is an assumed and anticipated part of our future economic recovery, the Fed anticipating continued slow growth during the next few months voted the status quo for interest rates with their announcement this week that "economic conditions are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period." Rates will stay where they are for now because the Federal Reserve group believes that even with economic growth ahead, it will be at a manageable pace.

On Martha’s Vineyard, for loans up to $417,000 you can get a 15-year fixed rate mortgage for 4.5%, with no points and a 30-year fixed with one point for 5.1%. 30-year loans are actually down by an eighth of a point at maturity.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Saturday, October 31, 2009

Martha's Vineyard First-Time Home Buyers See Continued Signs of Assistance and Relief

According to an article in the WSJ this week, the Senate has reached a compromise aimed at continuing assistance to first-time home buyers in the form of a tax credit. The agreement still has to pass the full Senate and the House but if it is approved it will extend the existing $8,000 tax credit for first-time homebuyers as well as add a new credit of up to $6,500 for some existing homeowners. The reduced credit would be available to all homebuyers who have been in their current residence for a consecutive five-year period in the past eight years.

Housing-industry sources in Washington are saying the qualifying income limits will be raised to $125,000 for single taxpayers and $250,000 for joint taxpayers, from the current $75,000 and $150,000. Should this new agreement become law, buyers must have executed sales agreements by April 30, and be able to close escrow by June 30, 2010.

On Martha’s Vineyard, in an effort to stimulate home sales to first-time home buyers, the Martha’s Vineyard Land Bank has increased the credit amount of the “M” Exemption. The “M” Exemption is a credit given only to eligible first-time home buyers toward the Land Bank Fee of 2% of the purchase price of real estate on Martha’s Vineyard.

Prior to September 1, 2004, the “M” exemption was $100,000 and in order to qualify all parties on the deed may not have ever owned real property at any time, not just on Martha’s Vineyard but anywhere. Subsequently, it was increased to $300,000 and the exemption was available to first-time purchasers of real estate who will domicile on the property within two years and hold the property for at least five years from the date of transfer. In the case of spouses, either spouse can have owned or possessed an interest in real property prior to the time of purchase, but not both spouses. As of October 27, 2009, per a recent amendment to the land bank law, first time purchasers may now claim a $400,000 "M" exemption. All of the other requirements of the "M" exemption are unchanged.

To learn more about the Martha’s Vineyard Land Bank please follow this link > What is the Martha's Vineyard Land Bank?

Labels: , , , , , ,

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

How long until we return to a balanced real estate market on Martha’s Vineyard?

My guess is 18 months. The unsold housing inventory of all properties and classifications on Martha’s Vineyard is just over 800 units. In any normal market, one that is balanced, the average time on market is about 90 days. When the inventory absorption rate or days on market (DOM) goes beyond 6 months we consider that to be a ‘buyer’s market’, and conversely when the average is less than 90 DOM we call that a ‘seller’s market’. When the inventory is high, buyers are in a better negotiating position --- as a rule. In order to thoroughly analyze the market you have to consider the various classifications and price lines as well as locations and the type of market. I think in our second home market the average time on market is a little longer. Buyers do not have to buy and sellers do not have to sell; they already have their primary residences.

As an example, taking only single family residences (SFR) on Martha’s Vineyard during the last 12 months, the average time on market was 317 days. Currently, the inventory of only SFR has increased to 516 units, so using the previous DOM rate we have about a 2 year supply of homes to absorb. I think it will be a lot less than that, as many more buyers are gaining confidence in our economic recovery and realizing the bottom of the market is here. Eager investors are entering into the market in increasing numbers to take advantage of the lower prices and attractive interest rates – below 5%!

Although the inventory is high, and actually increasing, in spite of all the recent sales, I attribute the increased inventory to more owners rushing their properties to market or re-listing their properties because they believe we have turned the corner and now is a better time to sell.

There are still those home owners who will be facing major loan adjustable rate resets before the end of the year and they want to get out now if they can in order to save their credit rating. Short sales continue to be a slippery slope for both sellers and buyers, but lenders are getting more assistance allowing them to be receptive to home owners applying for loan modifications. I do believe we will see more property loans in default even though a good majority of them will never go to auction, at least not on Martha’s Vineyard.

You still have time to take advantage of the many available and affordable opportunities in this market with the assurance that an investment made today will appreciate handsomely within the next five to seven years. Just remember, as the supply diminishes and demand increases those so-called good deals will become fewer and far between.

Labels: , , , ,

Saturday, October 24, 2009

Martha's Vineyard Condos are getting cheaper, but are they a wise investment?

We all know prices have dropped during the last 4 – 5 years, and in some areas like Las Vegas the roll back has been crushing and as much as 60%. But for most of the country it has averaged 25-35%. On Martha’s Vineyard the roll back has been to 2003 and 2004 prices, or about 15-20%, and in some price lines and Island towns there has been practically no depreciation.

Now that prices are dropping below $400,000 for a ‘habitable’ SFR, condo prices are also going down. As a result, more buyers who want to get a foothold on the Vineyard as home owners are turning to the less expensive condo market. However, there are growing concerns to be aware of when purchasing a condo in this economy and at this time.

All condo communities have associations and association dues that each owner is responsible for on a regular basis. The dues go toward day-to-day maintenance and taxes as well as maintaining a cash reserve for emergencies and major repairs like replacing roofs and siding. Because of the down turn in the economy -- loss of jobs, etc., many condo owners are unable to pay their fair share and that puts the burden on everyone else.

It is important to examine the homeowner’s association by contacting the association board and asking to review the financial documents, which you have a right to do before you close on a condo unit. You also want an inspector to examine the condition of not only the unit you are purchasing but also the common areas that the association is responsible for. You want to find out how dues are paid and what percentage of owners are current on their payments.

According to Leonard Baron, professor of finance at San Diego State University, in an interview for the WSJ, here are some important points to consider when purchasing a condo.

· The condo docs, master deed and financials can be voluminous and the information is tedious to go through, so don’t wait until the last minute to review them and do make sure you get all the documents. Prof. Baron advises that you request to review the condo docs the minute you are in escrow, and request at least three days to review them.

· About two-thirds of any condo association's budget should be operating expenses such as water, lights and landscaping. The remainder should be allocated as a reserve fund for items like roof and siding maintenance and road repair -- any items that are not considered routine and regular maintenance. “See if expenses exceed revenues due to foreclosures, unpaid dues or other reasons. If they do, ask the association what their plans are to make up the shortfall, and whether you should expect an assessment increase or higher dues. Ask also if there are plans to save costs by cutting pool hours, or the number of mowings or clubhouse cleanings. This could affect not only your comfort, but also the future marketability of your home.”

· Find out if a reserve study has been done. This is not required in every state, but it is becoming more common. A reserve study looks at all long-term anticipated maintenance and projected structural replacement items (i.e. roof) over a 30 year period. The costs are tallied and put together onto a payment and maintenance schedule. Your monthly dues should cover the monies that needs to be put away to establish the reserve fund account. Baron says "Many times the boards, under pressure by the owners, will hold the line on raising fees, to the long-term detriment of the property.” He estimates that most associations are only funded 50% or less, and you should have serious concern as to the health of the association if they are funded below 40%. "You could be hit with thousands of dollars in assessments if something expensive fails," he says.

In a number of markets where condo complexes range upwards of fifty to one hundred units, unless the association confirms adequate funding, many banks will not approve a mortgage. I have never been enthusiastic about condos on Martha’s Vineyard; it is not what I consider to be Vineyard lifestyle. Despite what you may think about upkeep on a home verses a condo, on Martha's Vineyard modest single family homes are very easy to take care of, and you own the dirt. Keep it simple; isn’t that why you want to be here?

Labels: , , , ,

Saturday, June 06, 2009

A Vineyard Primer Not Just For The Obamas

When I was a young child, my family would “summer in the Hamptons”, which describes the three towns near the far end of Long Island, NY. I remember the trip out there as if it were yesterday. It was an easy but boring 3-hour ride from Westchester County in our 1949 Ford “Woody” station wagon. We knew when we were getting close because the scenery would turn into potato fields and all you could smell was duck and chicken poop. The houses my family rented looked like the barracks I lived in during my military basic training and none of them were air conditioned, but they were right on the water. We would stay all summer and we rarely had a TV, but life was wonderfully simple.

The other night I watched the pilot program for a new TV series, ROYAL PAINS, on the USA Network. It’s about a young surgeon played by Mark Feuerstein who is fired from a hospital, sued for malpractice and blackballed. He decides to go to the Hamptons with his brother, the accountant, for a weekend of party crashing and debauchery, but he ends up staying for the summer as a concierge doctor to the rich and famous. What I like so much about the show is that it presents a showcase of the Hamptons in 2009. It sure has come a long way since I was a little boy or even since I went back there during my college years for fun and mischief.

Martha’s Vineyard could become, maybe it is already, the new home of the rich and famous --- the CEO and celebrity playground. With properties like Steve Rattner’s newly completed 15,000sf plus compound on Obed Daggett Road on Cedar Tree Neck, and the equally excessive estate properties belonging to high rollers like Brian Roberts, Dirk and Robert Ziff, Jerome Kenney and Bill Graham in the area, Martha’s Vineyard is losing its battle to stay small and simple the way it was 40 years ago when I first drove my yellow Corvette roadster off the ferry.

Many of us have received calls from the White House advance agents inquiring about accommodations for August rental lodging. The general consensus here is that the President will be renting a house on Temahigan Avenue close to the State Police headquarters, maybe the old Gloria Swanson house on the water side. There is still no definitive word on what the Clintons are planning, but we keep hearing about Ted Danson’s home up-Island and Chelsea’s wedding plans at the large Chilmark estate of long time Clinton friend and Washington power broker Vernon Jordan.

I guess we will just have to accept the fact that we are no longer inaccessible and anonymous; we have a reputation now that people like to brag about, and complain about. Maybe one day we will change our name to Martha’s Vineyardton. Here is a short essay that appeared in the Boston Globe titled A Vineyard primer for Obamas that provoked dozens of reader comments. The comments section is always fun to read because people have such strong views for and against what is Martha’s Vineyard. The Vineyard is all about passion and emotion and trying to hold onto what most of us remember as being so special and what so many new comers imagine still is so special. It is all of our jobs and responsibility to do all we can so that we don’t become just another East Hampton. Sure we have famous people here, but on Martha’s Vineyard no one gives a damn and we leave them alone. If you ‘GET’ the Vineyard and you want to be here, I can help you get the right place to live your dreams and balance your life. SplitRock Real Estate represents Buyers Only and their dreams.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Saturday, May 23, 2009

Martha's Vineyard Is Now Open For The Season --- Game On!

Our high season has finally arrived with this Memorial Day weekend. Old familiar faces are reappearing in the check-out line at Cronig’s. Young impatient preppy kids with newly minted driver’s licenses driving Daddy’s Mercedes act as if they own the road. Day trippers who have no clue where they are going whiz around precariously on mopeds, and islanders who are no longer able to day dream while behind the wheel of their cars or come and go as they please in pursuit of their daily chores are snapped back into reality, reminded that their space is no longer theirs alone, at least not for the next ten weeks. The Vineyard has awakened like a huge pinball machine once a quarter is inserted. Game on!

I hope it is a wonderful summer for everyone who really loves and appreciates this Island, understands its pace and recognizes that it is one of the only places on earth where you can recharge your physiological battery, redefine your spiritual center, nurture relationships with family and friends, and just “BE”. This is a special place and I love it. Having said that, I am going to go spend time with my wonderful wife, visit with good friends, go fishing, eat some great food and just “BE”.

Labels: , , , ,

Saturday, May 16, 2009

To Fish or Cut Bait, that is the Question….

It’s been a couple of weeks now since I planned a fishing outing with a good friend of mine for this weekend. He came to the Island this morning, and I really wanted to go fishing. Instead, I am working for several buyer clients who are going fishing; they are not sitting on the dock cutting bait. They recognize the time is right and the fish are in; they are getting rigged and ready to catch their prize winner.

Remember a few months ago when the property inventory was up around 800 units? Today the inventory of available SFR, Vacant Land, Condos and Commercial properties in all towns totals 658. There are 17 properties under Purchase and Sale Agreement and 10 Offers to Purchase. This is only a count of those properties updated in our LINK system. I can assure you there are more properties under negotiation and it is not uncommon to have multiple offers and bidding wars on the nicer properties.

To a great extent, the public opinion about the depressed state of the real estate market is based upon other parts of the country that are not as special as Martha’s Vineyard, not even close. But did you know property sales in some of those depressed real estate market areas are up? According to an article in this week’s WSJ, some of the states with big sales increases from the depressed levels of a year before included Nevada (up 117%), California (up 81%) and Arizona (up 50%) and Florida (up 25%).

Here on Martha’s Vineyard, prices are down, Sellers are ready to deal, FHA guidelines are easier and first time home buyers who qualify are taking advantage of the remarkable $8000 tax credit opportunity that will sunset at the end of this year.

I’ve got to get back to rigging fishing tackle for my clients, but I tell you if you want to catch one of those big ones you have got to get your line in the water very soon. Cast away or sail away. This is your time, so please, don’t miss the season.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Saturday, April 25, 2009

Is it Time To Go Real Estate Shopping on Martha's Vineyard?

During the last week I have been talking to other real estate agents and professionals in ancillary services about their market observations and workloads. The general consensus is clear; the Vineyard real estate market is rounding the corner, at least in the lower to mid-range.

Personally, I am seeing a lot more serious interest from consumers and clients. When I go to property showings with a client, the seller agents we meet say the same words right up front. “The seller is very motivated”. Normally, I think that is a silly thing to say because why else would anyone put their property on the market, and especially in a market like this. However, the truth is they are more than motivated; they are nervous as hell, and this is when deals are made.

I was looking at ‘Off Market’ low-end properties removed from the inventory around the first of the year and there really isn’t anything worth talking about that is not back on the market today. What is for sale is on the market and even though it may not be priced right, the sellers are ready to listen and work something out with buyers who are willing to put an offer on the table. The property inventory is saturated, rentals are soft and interest rates remain low. I think this is a perfect time to get into the market and see if you can get that dream home you have been wanting at a price that makes sense to you.

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, March 05, 2009

President Obama’s NEW Housing-Aid Plan – who WINS and who LOSES?

The new Housing-Aid Plan, according to the administration, is estimated to cover as many as nine million mortgage holders nationwide. It has two main components.

PART 1: Loan Modification
The first part supports borrowers who have kept up with their mortgage payments, but have lost so much value in their homes that they don’t have the equity necessary to refinance. Therefore, they are unable to take advantage of the present record low interest rates, which are hovering around 4%.

You WIN if you have payments of more than 31% of your pretax monthly income and you can prove hardship.

You WIN if you occupy a single-family home and can prove the home is your primary residence.

You WIN if you have an unpaid principal balance of $729,750 or less.

You WIN if you have a mortgage originated on or before January 1, 2009 and make all the modified payments over a trial period of three months or more.

You LOSE if you are not about to default.

You LOSE if you are an investor with a home that is not owner-occupied.

You LOSE if you have a home that is vacant of condemned.

You LOSE if you have an unpaid principal of more than $729,750.

You LOSE if your mortgage is packaged into securities whose rules explicitly forbid modification.

You LOSE if you have loan servicers who can’t be reached or are unwilling to consider modification.

PART 2: Loan Refinancing
The second part of the plan is geared toward borrowers who are already delinquent in their loan payments or are in eminent danger of default and aren’t able to refinance, perhaps due to a decrease in the value of their home.

You WIN if you have loans owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

You WIN if you are current on your mortgage payments.

You WIN if you can prove the ability to afford the new mortgage debt.

You WIN if your mortgage balance is no more than 105% of your current estimated home value.

You LOSE if you have loans owned or guaranteed by a company other than Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

You LOSE if you have been more than 30 days late on a payment in the past 12 months.

You LOSE if you can’t afford the new mortgage debt.

You LOSE if your home price has fallen so that the loan is more than 105% of the market price.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Good Property Opportunities on Martha's Vineyard

BANK OWNED PROPERTY (REO): This property was officially listed for resale by the lender on January 26, 2008 at an asking price of $564,900. The price was just reduced to $555,000, and the current town assessment is $697,100. The fact that the price has been reduced is standard procedure for a lender after 30 days without substantial interest in the property. This is a good sign for prospective buyers. The property is located in a nice neighborhood equidistant to all down-Island towns and is a lot of house for the money.

Click here to view property > Edgartown - 6 Mockingbird Drive

Labels: , , , , , ,

Sunday, February 15, 2009

Good Property Opportunities on Martha's Vineyard

SHORT SALE: Located close to the hospital and 5 minutes from either Vineyard Haven or Oak Bluffs Harbor, this 2100 sf colonial style 3 bedroom 2.5 bath home on a quarter acre lot is being offered at the distress price of $450,000. The assessed value for 2009 is $576, 700 and it was purchased in 2006 for $612,000. Please note that this property may very well sell for more than the asking price and offer acceptance is subject to approval by the lender.

Click here to view property > Oak Bluffs - 3 Linton Avenue

Labels: , , , , , ,

Friday, February 13, 2009

Good Property Opportunities on Martha's Vineyard

This nicely constructed spec house was just completed. It started out priced at $750,000, but the price was just reduced to $599,000. This puts it at a number for which you would not be able to reproduce this new home. The lot alone is assessed at 258K.

Click here to view property > Oak Bluffs - 10 Eastville Avenue

Labels: , , , , ,

Agency Disclosure Follow-up for Buyers Only on Martha’s Vineyard

In my recent Blog titled “For Buyers Only on Martha’s Vineyard” I spoke about Agency Disclosure. I want to revisit the subject and add some statistical numbers tabulated by the National Association of REALTORS® (NAR).

Making the decision to be an Exclusive Buyer Agent is one that many real estate practitioners feel limits their potential for maximum income, because you can only walk on one side of the street --- the BUYER’s side. There is no double dipping or switching hats to suit the occasion. Exclusive Buyer Agents have to have a passion for protecting the buying public.

According to a recent essay published in NAEBAhood News written by John Sullivan of Buyer’s Edge in Bethesda, MD, “The abrogation of the common law of agency promulgated by NAR and instituted individually by state legislatures throughout the country … resulted in eliminating the fiduciary duties of obedience, loyalty, confidentiality, and reasonable care.” On my website, I painstakingly put together information outlining the differences and explaining what are the duties of a Fiduciary to a Principal/Client?

Sadly, I have personally witnessed buyer confusion as a result of the foreclosures we are experiencing here on Martha’s Vineyard. A distressed home owner told me the other day that he blamed his agent and the lender for giving him a loan they had no business approving. He will most likely lose his home because he will not be allowed to work it out since he still has no documentation to verify his income. Lenders have much stricter requirements today, as they should have had all along, and those requirements seem to be changing on a daily basis. Sure, the buyer should have known better (caveat emptor), but when he had three so-called professionals who he believed were on his side, he trusted that he was doing the right thing. In most cases, the real estate agents, mortgage brokers and even the attorneys that participated in the purchase sale transactions had no compunction about what they were doing, even though in their hearts they knew it was unlikely the buyer could fulfill their obligation according to the terms of the loan(s).

Much of the confusion comes from the fact that consumers are not informed of the real estate agent’s role in the transaction. According to NAR’s own study, only 30% of homebuyers were presented with the Mandatory Agency Disclosure Form at the first face-to-face meeting to discuss a specific property. Only 28% received the disclosure form when the purchase contract was written, and 22% never received it at all. 20% of the homebuyers could not even remember a discussion about the fiduciary responsibility of the agent or the options available to them. First time homebuyers were the most neglected with only 23% receiving the agency disclosure at the first meeting to discuss property. Those numbers are pathetic. No wonder consumers don’t trust real estate agents.

Massachusetts implemented their Mandatory Agency Disclosure in 2005, but I believe the state has done very little to enforce the law or properly educate consumers, or practitioners.

NAR’s only option for what they call Exclusive Buyer Agency provides a mechanism stated as “with consent to dual agency”. To me that is an oxymoron and the word “Exclusive” should be removed from the NAR Right To Represent Buyer Agreement. Here is the wording some brokers are using. See if it makes you, as a consumer, comfortable and confident that you will receive the maximum care and guidance you want.

Consent to Dual Agency. The BUYER understands that BROKER also represents seller and that if BROKER shows BUYER a property listed by a seller-client a “dual agency” will be created. The BROKER may act as a dual agent who represents both prospective BUYER and SELLER with their informed written consent. A dual agent is authorized to assist the BUYER and SELLER in a transaction, but shall be neutral with regard to any conflicting interest of the BUYER and SELLER. Consequently, a dual agent will not have the ability to satisfy fully the duties of loyalty, full disclosure, reasonable care and obedience to lawful instruction, but shall still owe the duty of confidentiality of material information and the duty to account for funds. The BUYER understands that material information received from either client that is confidential may not be disclosed by a dual agent, except: (1) if disclosure is expressly authorized; (2) if such disclosure is required by law; (3) if such disclosure is intended to prevent illegal conduct; or (4) if such disclosure is necessary to prosecute a claim against a person represented or to defend a claim against the broker or salesperson. This duty of confidentiality shall continue after termination of the brokerage relationship. By signing the agreement, BUYER authorizes BROKER to act as a dual agent and consents to dual agency. If dual agency occurs in a transaction, a notice of dual agency will be given.

Exclusive Buyer Agency is a commitment members of the National Association of Exclusive Buyer Agents (NAEBA) make to consumers. This is a black and white cut and dry commitment; there are no gray areas and it takes passion and dedication to subscribe to this business model. For 100% representation 100% of the time, insist upon working with an Exclusive Buyer Agent when you are purchasing real estate of any kind.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Thursday, February 12, 2009

Good Property Opportunities on Martha's Vineyard

There are two properties that I want to bring to your attention. I know they are on opposite ends of the price spectrum but they are both worthy of comment.

The first one is a simple extended Cape that has just been reduced in price to $495,000. The 2009 assessment is 533K.

Click here to view property >
Vineyard Haven - 81 Hazelwood Avenue

The second property is an architect designed contemporary in the West Chop area. This is in my opinion a beautifully designed home with a very good address.

Click here to view property > Vineyard Haven - 97 Golf Club Road

Labels: , , , , ,

Sunday, February 08, 2009

For Buyers Only on Martha’s Vineyard

In an article titled ‘AGENCY, Know Your Facts’ published in the January 2009 Newsletter by the Cape Cod & Islands Association of Realtors®, Inc the following points were made under the topic heading “ The Law”. There were many other facts discussed, but I thought these two would be of particular interest to consumers.

  • Designated Agency is a process where the broker of record, with the consent of the consumer, designates one or more agents to represent a Seller and designates one or more agents to represent a Buyer in the same transaction. The relationship with the consumer begins and ends with the designated agent and does not extend to the other agents in the office. In a designated agency firm, the broker is a dual agent and retains all legal and ethical responsibility for the transaction.”

Although there is a definition of Designated Agency on the Mandatory Disclosure form, I do not discuss it as part of my consumer education process because traditional real estate agencies on Martha’s Vineyard only practice Disclosed Dual Agency. The concept of Dual Agency in itself is difficult enough for consumers to wrap their minds around. I have a lot of information on agency representation on my website FOR BUYERS ONLY.

The main reason Designated Agency is not a consumer service offered on Martha’s Vineyard is because the offices are not large enough, and because the principal brokers realize this is much to frothy a concept for them to handle comfortably. But come on folks, read the definition again and see if it does not totally blow your mind. We all know that business is primarily all about the money, and with guidelines like these and human nature such as it is --- I mean really!

The next topic discussed in the newsletter was Agency Disclosure.

  • “The Agency Disclosure requirement stipulates that at the first personal meeting to discuss a specific property, prospective Buyers and Sellers be notified of the agency relationship using the state disclosure form, which must be signed by the Buyer or Seller and retained on record by the broker for a minimum of three years.”

In Massachusetts, as stated above, the Agency Disclosure form is a Mandatory requirement. It is not a contract and therefore does not bind the consumer in any way to the agent they are working with. It is an effort to avoid misunderstanding and litigation by providing full disclosure. However, many agents do not present the Agency Disclosure form to the consumer at all. Perhaps they are fearful it will be off-putting or, in reality, it is because they themselves do not understand it and don’t realize it is the law. Also, many agents present the mandatory disclosure to consumers with the implied assumption that it binds the consumer to them as a ‘client’. This misrepresentation and use of the Agency Disclosure form is critical to any relationship actual or implied.

When an agent presents a mandatory agency disclosure form to a Seller and the agent selects that he/she represents a Seller, you can rest assured it is because that Seller has entered into a contractual relationship with the agent who is now the Seller’s fiduciary. The agent has an ‘Exclusive Listing Agreement’ with the Seller. If the agent selects that he/she represents the Buyer, legally that agent can only do so with written authorization and consideration from the Buyer. These are the elements that define a contract (“An agreement with specific terms between two or more persons or entities in which there is a promise to do something in return for a valuable benefit known as consideration”).

Establishing Buyer Representation must be a two-pronged conversation. “Mr and Mrs Buyer, I am required by law to present you with this Agency Disclosure form mandated by Massachusetts Law, which I must ask you to sign before we can discuss any properties you are interested in. I want to be your Exclusive Buyer Agent, but unless we also execute an Exclusive Right To Represent Agreement, I will not be able to advocate in your best interests as your fiduciary.”

If a written contract is not executed establishing a fiduciary relationship with a Buyer, the agent is actually a Facilitator and represents neither the Buyer nor the Seller. Just remember that the Seller will have 100% representation and you the Buyer can also have 100% representation, but only if you enter into an Exclusive Right To Represent Agreement without consent to Dual Agency.

Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

All Real Estate Is Local?

The National Association of Realtors has been working diligently through national ads for several years to educate consumers that all real estate is local. They don’t think what is happening in one area of the country is happening everywhere. I absolutely agree but it is like second hand smoke, everyone is affected to one degree or another.

With the ever deepening economic crisis crawling into every aspect of our lives and the reality that this is a global crisis of unprecedented proportion, I would rephrase the slogan and say all real estate is the same, but different.

I was reading an article about the effects of what is now an epidemic real estate crisis in the UK, effecting one of the wealthiest resort areas in the world. Fortunes have been lost and high rollers living in $7,000,000 homes are now living in apartments above retail shops. Playgrounds around the world are all affected by the hubris that brought the market down, from Hollywood to Dubai and Monte Carlo.

I am going to paraphrase part of a commentary that expresses a sentiment that rang a bell for me with regard to Martha’s Vineyard. However, it was written about a seaside luxury resort area in the UK. I will leave out the location specific parts so you can fill in the blanks.

“I’M not surprised the credit crunch has hit (blank). … Why should it be immune?”

“(Blank) is a very, very beautiful place. If prices coming down makes it more accessible to ordinary people, that is a good thing.”

“Locals were becoming very concerned about the way the place was changing.”

“(Blank) is a quintessentially English place and should remain so.”

“Prices … were way too high. The fact they are coming down is good.”

“It makes (blank) more affordable and attracts the right kind of person for the area.”

“Hopefully more local people will be able to afford to move there and it will remain as beautiful as it is.”

All those who feel this way about Martha’s Vineyard raise your hands.

Labels: , , , , , , ,